And while much of the voting in Survivor is against someone else, many of the theories still apply. So what have I learnt?
- There is no fair way to vote. Dr. Sean Kenniff learnt that in Season 1 with his fair alphabetical system of voting. Almost all of his votes were throw aways and he still pissed people off.
- The "Rats and Snakes" speech also applies to politics. Susan Hawk strongly felt that everyone in the game was either a rat or a snake. Political advertising often feels like the same speech, edited by highly educated speech writers.
- No matter how much you like someone if they aren't in the right alliance then they don't get your vote.
- Sometimes you can't vote for the person you want to win, but against the person you don't want to win.
- Vote splitting is risky but can be used to masterful results. Of course there are no hidden immunity idols in politics, but after a number of minority governments it feels similar.
- Tribal Counsel and a Candidates Debate are strikingly similar. Although the debates could really use Jeff Probst to mediate.
- You want to trust, but really you can't.
- Sometimes the tail coat rider wins.
- Sometimes you can come back and win it all - Redemption Island, crazy twists where people get to come back or all-star seasons. You never know if someone is really out until the final votes are counted. Or after Jeff Probst does a crazy transportion montage to the LA studio.
- Causing discord at camp can be used to your advantage.
- The people who you may piss off while in office are also the ones who have to vote for you in the end.
- You have to vote to stay alive in the game.
Brilliant! You had a snakepit of a riding there sister!
ReplyDeleteIndeed I did. At least there were more than 20 votes separating the top candidates this year.
ReplyDelete